So please chose your channel wisly when your trying to listen to news about Isreal. I preffer CNN and not FOX because Fox is a 100% jewish channel.
aha so it was the Jews who made sure that all we seen on American news in recent weeks was how Israel was killing the innocent lebanese people, and how Israel was the aggressor without any negative coverage of hezbollah. Yeah right.
Many of the Jews here have emphatically said that Judaism is a belief not a race. Some have even said that the idea of Jews as a race was something started my the Nazis.
I was rather surprised to read this news item:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8325901.stm
Where the JFS (Jewish Free School) is appealing against a court decision that entry should be granted on belief not birth. Evidently the school wants to bar access to a child because of doubts about the Jewishness of his mother, despite the fact that according to her husband "[She] keeps a kosher Jewish home, we go to synagogue as a family, my daughter teaches in the Hebrew classes."
This seems to contradict what many Jewish posters here have said. Is the school wrong, or is there some other explanation?
The problem is simple – there are diverse viewpoints regarding this.
See:
Who is a Jew?
A Jew is any person whose mother was a Jew or any person who has gone through the formal process of conversion to Judaism.
It is important to note that being a Jew has nothing to do with what you believe or what you do. A person born to non-Jewish parents who has not undergone the formal process of conversion but who believes everything that Orthodox Jews believe and observes every law and custom of Judaism is still a non-Jew, even in the eyes of the most liberal movements of Judaism, and a person born to a Jewish mother who is an atheist and never practices the Jewish religion is still a Jew, even in the eyes of the ultra-Orthodox. In this sense, Judaism is more like a nationality than like other religions, and being Jewish is like a citizenship. See What Is judaism?
This has been established since the earliest days of Judaism. In the Torah, you will see many references to "the strangers who dwell among you" or "righteous proselytes" or "righteous strangers." These are various classifications of non-Jews who lived among Jews, adopting some or all of the beliefs and practices of Judaism without going through the formal process of conversion and becoming Jews. Once a person has converted to Judaism, he is not referred to by any special term; he is as much a Jew as anyone born Jewish.
Although all Jewish movements agree on these general principles, there are occasional disputes as to whether a particular individual is a Jew. Most of these disputes fall into one of two categories.
First, traditional Judaism maintains that a person is a Jew if his mother is a Jew, regardless of who his father is. The liberal movements, on the other hand, consider a person to be Jewish if either of his parents was Jewish and the child was raised Jewish. Thus, if the child of a Jewish father and a Christian mother is raised jewish, the child is a Jew according to the Reform movement, but not according to the Orthodox movement. On the other hand, if the child of a Christian father and a Jewish mother is not raised Jewish, the child is a Jew according to the Orthodox movement, but not according to the Reform movement! The matter becomes even more complicated, because the status of that children’s children also comes into question.
Second, the more traditional movements do not always acknowledge the validity of conversions by the more liberal movements. The more modern movements do not always follow the procedures required by the more traditional movements, thereby invalidating the conversion. In addition, Orthodoxy does not accept the authority of Conservative, Reform and Reconstructionist rabbis to perform conversions, and the Conservative movement has debated whether to accept the authority of Reform rabbis.
More here:
http://www.jewfaq.org/whoisjew.htm
Am I the only one that thinks this is the most idiotic thing ever? Despite having a holocaust survivor in the family and apparently being aware of his adopted countries history and the history of his family, one of these numbnuts actually thought (maybe thought is too strong a word) that attacking synagogues, orthodox Jews, memorials and adopting the anti semitic practices of the last nazi regime was a good idea.
Lets have some current affairs dialogue that doesn’t include the word "McCann"
It proves what I believe to be the case with neo-nazis, they are brainless idiots, as are those that believe that that neo-nazi organisations such as the BNP are good for the UK.
It happened July 28, and I haven’t heard anything about it since. Its obviously a hate crime, and a cowardly one. The jewish women weren’t armed, and their only crime was being jewish. Why isn’t it covered in the news?
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/279302_shooting28ww.html
There’s a double standard when it comes to Jews. The world doesn’t care.
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/
None of the reporters reporting the news are jewish. So your stupid theory is all wet
Several high profile policymakers and politicians, including Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee for the US presidential election, will address the America Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac) conference this week.
But Aipac is not the only organisation competing for the hearts and minds of jewish Americans.
A new group known as J Street has launched an ambitious effort to make alternative views on the Middle East heard in the US capital.
Tom Ackerman reports.
Duration : 0:2:47
Instead of whining, griping and wanting welfare, they worked hard and succeeded in their lives, not depending on government to support them.
No, I don’t think so. Usually Orthodox, we’re so crazy, we have our own medias because usually the secular stuff is considered sinful because of the stuff they show.
Peace
The 
A very interesting secular news story on Channel 2 news in Israel on the growing Messianic