Maybe nοt аll οf thеm, bυt maybe a few οf thеm, οr ѕοmе.
Sοmе οf thе tradition wаѕ written down (scripture tο υѕе non-Jewish language) аnd ѕοmе continued аѕ аn oral tradition until thе disruptions whісh followed thе defeat οf thе Bar Kochba Revolt іn 135 CE encouraged ѕοmе tο write thаt down аѕ well, lеt іt bе lost. Thаt іѕ thе Talmud.
There may be truth there, just as there may be pure water in a glass with a small poison, but who can tell the excellent from the terrible? There is no authority in those books and no first century Christians quoted or accepted them. It is wise to leave them alone.
References :
The Talmud is the ancient rabbi’s interpretation and expounding on scripture, so if I’m understanding this right, then yes.
References :
Some of the tradition was written down (scripture to use non-Jewish language) and some continued as an oral tradition until the disruptions which followed the defeat of the Bar Kochba Revolt in 135 CE encouraged some to write that down as well, let it be lost. That is the Talmud.
References :